|
|
Ecclesiology
Church Councils:
Do Eastern Catholic bishops
participate in Roman Catholic Church
Councils? If so, in what capacity?
Concerning Roman Catholic
Church Councils, I assume that you are referring to
Councils such as Trent and Vatican II, not Bishops
Conferences. Eastern Catholics participated as full
members in both Vatican I and II, and played a crucial
role in the proceedings of Vatican II. Some of the
documents from these Councils had no effect on Eastern
Catholics (such as those involving the Latin Liturgy and
Latin disciplines). Yet several documents from Vatican
II had an enomorsely positive effect on Eastern
Catholics.
 Top
of page
"Roman" Catholic:
Aren't all Catholics
"Roman" Catholics, whatever their rite may be?
There is apparently some confusion as to the phrase
"Roman Catholic." In Church documents, you will not find
the phrase "Roman Catholic" used to describe the
universal Church. Instead, the only phrase used to
describe it is simply "the Catholic Church."
For
instance, the recent Vatican document Dominus Iesus says
the following in paragraph no. 16: "This Church,
constituted and organized as a society in the present
world, subsists in [subsistit in] the Catholic Church,
governed by the Successor of Peter and by the Bishops in
communion with him."
Nowhere does this document
refer to the universal Church as the Roman Catholic
Church. Likewise, the DOGMATIC CONSTITUTION ON THE
CHURCH, Lumen Gentium, nowhere uses the term "Roman
Catholic." Nor is it used in any documents of comparable
authority. It does not appear in any code of canon law.
From a strictly canonical standpoint, there is no "Roman
Catholic" Church.
However, you will somecentury
encounter the phrase "Church of Rome" in Church
documents. This phrase is used to denote the actual
Diocese of Rome. Somecentury it is also used to denote
the bishop who presides over this diocese, the Holy
Father.
In Church legislation and canons, the
Western Church is referred to as the Latin Church.
However, in everyday usage members of the Latin Church
refer to it as the "Roman Catholic Church." For
instance, in the small town of Toronto, Ohio there are
two Catholic parishes. On one side of the town is St.
Joseph's Byzantine Catholic Church. On the other side of
town is St. Joseph's Roman Catholic Church. That's
exactly what the sign says in front of the parish. And
everyone knows that this parish is part of the Latin
Church.
Here's another pertinent example. In the
city of Pittsburgh there are two Catholic dioceses.
There is the Byzantine Catholic diocese, and also the
"Roman Catholic Diocese of Pittsburgh." That is the
actual name of the diocese. Everyone knows that this
diocese is part of the Latin Church because it calls
itself the "Roman Catholic" diocese. If a Byzantine
parish were to advertise itself as St. Nicholas Roman
Catholic Church, there would be endless confusion.
That's because, in popular usage, Roman Catholic has
become synonymous with the Latin Church.
This matter is further complicated because there
exists in canon law a "Roman Rite." The Roman Rite is
used exclusively by the Latin Church. Eastern Catholics
object to being called "Roman Catholics" because we do
not use the Roman Rite, as Latin Catholics do. It seems
to us that the term "Roman Catholic" is best reserved
for Catholics who use the Roman Rite.
 Top
of page
Patriarchs #1:
What is a Patriarch?
A
Patriarch is a bishop with special authority over the
other bishops in an autonomous ritual Church. According
to the NCCB document Eastern Catholics in the United
States of America, Patriarchs are "heads of their own
individual churches." The Second Vatican Council
underscored the special honor given to Patriarchs:
"Following the most ancient tradition of the Church,
special honor is to be given to the patriarchs of the
Eastern Churches, since each is set over his
patriarchate as father and head," (Orientalium
Ecclesiarum no. 9).
It should be noted that the
Latin Church also has its own Patriarch: the Pope. As
well as being head of the universal Church, the Pope
also functions as Patriarch of the Latin Church.
Patriarchs #2:It's my understanding that "sui
iuris" translates roughly into "self governing". Being
under the authority of the pope, how much freedom do
Eastern Catholic patriarchs indeed have in the governing
of their jurisdictions? Can they ordain bishops freely,
or must episcopal ordinations be approved by Rome?
In their "traditional" geographic territories Eastern
Catholic Patriarchs, together with their Synods, have
full authority over their Churches. They can ordain
bishops freely without seeking the approval of Rome.
Outside of the "traditional" territories, in the
so-called "diaspora," the authority of Eastern Catholic
Patriarchs is somewhat limited. While they maintain full
authority in liturgical matters, the appointment of
bishops is done by the Congregation for the Oriental
Churches in Rome.
Top of page
Eastern Pope:
Is it possible for an
Eastern rite Catholic to be elected pope? Has there ever
been one?
Yes, it is possible. In the history of the
Catholic Church, there have been at least ten Easterners
elected as Pope. Each one became Patriarch of the Latin
Church, and celebrated the Roman Rite.
When all
is said and done, I think that it is preferable that the
Pope belong to the Latin Church. Why? Because the Pope,
by definition, is the Bishop of Rome. And by tradition,
the Bishop of Rome is Patriarch of the Latin Church.
Top of page
"Thus
says the LORD of hosts: Behold, I will save my people from the East
country and from the West country; and I will bring them to dwell in the
midst of Jerusalem; and they shall be my people and I will be their God,
in faithfulness and in righteousness." -Zech 8:7-8
Home | FAQ | Articles | Links | Email | Mount Aloysius |
|