Reception of Communion: Which
tradition is older, receiving communion by the hand onto the tongue or
by dropping it into the mouth from a silver spoon, like some Eastern
rites do?
Almost all liturgical scholars believe that communion in the hand was
the earliest practice. However, just because something is early doesn't
necessarily mean that it is best for our time. In most of the Byzantine
Churches, communion is administered from a spoon because the Body is
soaked in the Precious Blood. From a practical perspective, a spoon is
necessary. In the Melkite and Maronite Churches, the Body is dipped into
the Precious Blood, and dropped into the communicants mouth by the
priest or deacon's hand. The Latin Church was able to allow a return to
communion in the hand because the Body is not dipped or soaked in the
Blood. However, there is concern among some Latin Catholics that
communion in the hand is less reverent. I can understand their concern.
Nonetheless, communion in the hand is a legitimate practice.
ÙTop
of page
Liturgical
Languages: Is it true that some Eastern Catholic parishes
use English in their liturgy now? Is this allowed?
In the United States many Eastern Catholic parishes celebrate the
Liturgy in English. My own Church, the Byzantine-Ruthenian Catholic
Church, celebrates Divine Liturgy almost exclusively in English in the
U.S. This is because we are very Americanized, and have members from
numerous racial and ethnic backgrounds. The Ukrainian Catholics, in
contrast, are still very close to their immigrant roots. They are still
receiving new waves of immigrants on a regular basis. Thus, they use
Ukrainian in most of their Divine Liturgies because it is what the
people are most comfortable with.
The ancient tradition of the Eastern Churches is for Liturgy to be
celebrated in the language of the people. Hence, Byzantine Catholics
were actually celebrating the Divine Liturgy in English here in America,
while Roman Catholics were still using Latin.
ÙTop
of page
Musical Instrumentation: Does the
Eastern Catholic Church maintain the tradition of not permitting musical
instrumentation such as organ music, piano, or guitar music, during the
Divine Liturgy?
Most Eastern Catholic Churches do not use any musical instrumentation
during the Divine Liturgy. The Ethiopian Catholics do use drums,
however.
The reason that we don't use instrumentation is because of our
particular perspective on the Liturgy. We try very hard to model our
liturgical worship on the Liturgy being celebrated in heaven, as it is
depicted in Biblical books such as Revelation. In such texts the
heavenly Liturgy is celebrated using primarily the human voice.
ÙTop
of page
Infant Communion:
You referred to Infant Communion as being an ancient practice in the
Eastern Rite. I have been thinking a lot about it; it makes so much more
sense to me than the Roman practice. Can you help me understand better
how ancient this is and why the Roman Catholic Church does not do this?
In the ancient Church, both Western and Eastern, it was very common for
infants to receive communion immediately after Baptism. In the East, it
was the norm for them to continue receiving the Eucharist each week. In
the West, it was more typical for them to only receive the Eucharist
immediately following Baptism, and not again until they were older.
Nonetheless, weekly infant communion was practiced in many parts of the
Western Church. This changed definitively for the West at the Fourth
Lateran Council, and later the Council of Trent. These Councils taught
that children must be able to understand what they are receiving, so
that they can give devotion to the Eucharist. This teaching did not
effect the discipline of the Eastern Churches.
The Catechism of the Council of Trent teaches that the Eucharist should
not be received by "those who on account of their tender age have not
attained the use of reason. For these are not able to distinguish the
Holy Eucharist from common and ordinary bread and cannot bring with them
to this Sacrament piety and devotion. Furthermore (to extend the precept
to them) would appear inconsistent with the ordinance of our Lord, for
He said: Take and eat words which cannot apply to infants, who are
evidently incapable of taking and eating." (The Catechism of Trent, on
the Holy Eucharist)
Obviously I, as a Byzantine Catholic, strongly favor infant communion.
But the Latin Church is entitled to its own discipline in this regard.
Both disciplines are allowed to coexist in the Catholic Church, and must
be respected.
ÙTop
of page
Mystery of Matrimony:
I recently attended a Byzantine Catholic wedding, and the bride and
groom did not recite wedding vows. Why?
Traditionally, in the Byzantine Churches vows are not exchanged during
the wedding ceremony. Rather, the most significant event is the placing
of the crowns on the heads of the bride and groom, together with the
blessing of the priest. However, some Byzantine Catholic Churches added
vows to the ceremony in an attempt to conform to Western culture. This
was an unfortunate departure from Byzantine tradition.
ÙTop
of page
Moment of
Consecration: When does transubstantiation take place in
the Divine Liturgy?
Concerning the moment of "transubstantiation," Eastern Catholic theology
does not narrow in exclusively on the words of institution as being the
moment of consecration. The Eastern Church Fathers taught that the
Eucharist mysteriously becomes the body and blood of Christ sometime
during the anaphora (Eucharistic prayer). Eastern Catholics have
traditionally placed a great emphasis on the epiclesis, which is the
moment in which the Holy Spirit is called down upon the gifts to
transform them into the Body and Blood of Christ. In the great Eatern
Liturgies, which we still use, the epiclesis comes after the words of
institution.
This difference in no way ruptures our communion with the Latin Church.
Rather, it highlights what is distinctive about Eastern Christian
theology: a heavy emphasis on mystery. We choose to believe that Christ
manifests himself in the Eucharist at some (unspecified) time during the
Eucharistic prayer. Narrowing in on an exact moment of consecration is
not the Eastern style. Rather, we see the coming of Christ in the
Eucharist as being a great mystery which we are unable to comprehend.
ÙTop
of page
"Mass" or
"Divine Liturgy?" Could you explain why the celebration of
the Eucharist is called in the Latin Church "Holy Mass" and in the
Eastern Churches "Divine Liturgy," and whether the two terms may be used
interchangeably?
The word "Mass" refers properly only to the Eucharistic Liturgy of the
Latin Church. The word has its origins in a dismissal found only in this
liturgy. At the end of the celebration, the priest says (in Latin) "Ite
missa est." This can be roughly translated as "The dismissal is made."
In time the word "missa" was used to designate the entire Latin liturgy,
and the word began to be pronounced as "Mass" by the laity.
In the Eastern Churches, the Liturgy is properly referred to as the
"Divine Liturgy." Liturgy is a Greek word, meaning "the work of the
people." Literally, Divine Liturgy means "the heavenly work of the
people." In the Eastern Liturgies there is a strong sense that the
congregation has left this world, and is being mystically transported to
heaven, where we participate in the Heavenly Liturgy. That is why we
don't use musical instruments.
It really is not correct to use the two terms interchangeably, although
it sometimes happens.
ÙTop
of page
Blessed Bread #1:
I attended an Eastern Orthodox liturgy a while back and I noticed that
at the end, the congregation was allowed to take home the remaining
Eurharist. Was this the Eucharist or was it just some other bread?
What the people received at the end of the liturgy is not the Eucharist.
It is called "antidoran," which is blessed bread given out after
communion. In Eastern Orthodox Churches it is traditional to distribute
the antidoran at the end of every liturgy. The antidoran comes from the
same loaf as the consecrated Eucharist, but it is not consecrated but
blessed. It harkens back to the era in which Christians received
communion infrequently, only once or twice a year. Because people didn't
receive communion, they would come up to receive the antidoran. Thus,
antidoran literally means "instead of the gift." Most Eastern Orthodox
parishes will offer the antidoran to any baptized Christian, although
some will only offer it to Orthodox Christians.
ÙTop
of page
Blessed Bread #2:Do the Eastern
Catholic Churches distribute blessed bread like they do in the Eastern
Orthodox Churches?
The distribution of antidoran is common to both the Byzantine and
Armenian liturgical traditions. I do not know if any other traditions
use it. Among Byzantine Catholics, the practice varies. I know from
personal experience that Byzantine Catholics of the Ruthenian Recension
have largely abandoned the practice, although the antidoran is still
distributed on certain feast days together with an annointing.
ÙTop
of page
Role of Woman #1:
As you know, for sometime the Latin Rite has utilized female lectors,
ushers, altar servers and Eucharistic Ministers. What, if any, functions
are open to women during Eastern Rite services?
In the Eastern Catholic Churches women can (and do) serve as cantors,
lectors, and ushers/greeters. Some of our very best cantors are women,
and in the Eastern Churches cantors play a crucial role. It is difficult
to celebrate the liturgy properly without a trained and experienced
cantor.
ÙTop
of page
Role of Woman
#2: Is a true that a
woman cannot approach the santuary except during church cleaning?
In the Byzantine tradition women are generally not allowed to go behind
the icon screen (there are exceptions). However, this isn't a judgement
against women or anything of that nature. It is simply that the
sanctuary (which we call the altar) is a sacred area, and no one is
allowed in there unless they have a specific reason to be there. I, as a
layman, am forbidden to enter there unless I have been told to do so.
Even the priest only enters the sanctuary when he is carrying out a
liturgical function, or is making preparations to do so. Since in our
tradition we do not have altar girls, there usually isn't a reason for a
woman to enter into the altar.
ÙTop
of page